添加 claude code game studios 到项目

This commit is contained in:
panw
2026-05-15 14:52:29 +08:00
parent dff559462d
commit a16fe4bff7
415 changed files with 78609 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,362 @@
# Skill Flow Diagrams
Visual maps of how skills chain together across the 7 development phases.
These show what runs before and after each skill, and what artifacts flow between them.
---
## Full Pipeline Overview (Zero to Ship)
```
PHASE 1: CONCEPT
/start ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────► routes to A/B/C/D
/brainstorm ──────────────────────────────────────────────────► design/gdd/game-concept.md
/setup-engine ────────────────────────────────────────────────► CLAUDE.md + technical-preferences.md
/prototype [core-mechanic] ───────────────────────────────────► prototypes/[name]-concept/REPORT.md
│ PROCEED (validate idea BEFORE writing GDDs)
/design-review [game-concept.md] ────────────────────────────► concept validated
/gate-check ─────────────────────────────────────────────────► PASS → advance to systems-design
PHASE 2: SYSTEMS DESIGN
/map-systems ────────────────────────────────────────────────► design/gdd/systems-index.md
▼ (for each system, in dependency order)
/design-system [name] ──────────────────────────────────────► design/gdd/[system].md
/design-review [system].md ─────────────────────────────────► per-GDD review comments
▼ (after all MVP GDDs done)
/review-all-gdds ────────────────────────────────────────────► design/gdd/gdd-cross-review-[date].md
/gate-check ─────────────────────────────────────────────────► PASS → advance to technical-setup
PHASE 3: TECHNICAL SETUP
/create-architecture ────────────────────────────────────────► docs/architecture/master.md
/architecture-decision (×N) ─────────────────────────────────► docs/architecture/[adr-nnn].md
/architecture-review ────────────────────────────────────────► review report + docs/architecture/tr-registry.yaml
/create-control-manifest ────────────────────────────────────► docs/architecture/control-manifest.md
/gate-check ─────────────────────────────────────────────────► PASS → advance to pre-production
PHASE 4: PRE-PRODUCTION
[UX — before epics, so specs exist when stories are written]
/ux-design [screen/hud/patterns] ────────────────────────────► design/ux/*.md
/ux-review ──────────────────────────────────────────────────► UX specs approved (HARD gate for /team-ui)
[Test infrastructure — scaffold before stories reference tests]
/test-setup ─────────────────────────────────────────────────► test framework + CI/CD pipeline
/test-helpers ───────────────────────────────────────────────► tests/helpers/[engine-specific].gd
[Vertical slice — before epics, validate full game loop]
/vertical-slice ─────────────────────────────────────────────► prototypes/[name]-vertical-slice/REPORT.md
/playtest-report ────────────────────────────────────────────► production/playtests/
[Stories + sprint plan — only after vertical slice PROCEEDS]
/create-epics [layer] ───────────────────────────────────────► production/epics/*/EPIC.md
/create-stories [epic-slug] ─────────────────────────────────► production/epics/*/story-*.md
/sprint-plan new ────────────────────────────────────────────► production/sprints/sprint-01.md
/gate-check ─────────────────────────────────────────────────► PASS → advance to production
PHASE 5: PRODUCTION (repeating sprint loop)
/sprint-status ──────────────────────────────────────────────► sprint snapshot
/story-readiness [story] ────────────────────────────────────► story validated READY
▼ (pick up and implement)
/dev-story [story] ──────────────────────────────────────────► routes to correct programmer agent
▼ (during implementation, as needed)
/code-review ────────────────────────────────────────────────► code review report
/scope-check ────────────────────────────────────────────────► scope creep detected / clear
/content-audit ──────────────────────────────────────────────► GDD content gaps identified
/bug-report ─────────────────────────────────────────────────► production/qa/bugs/bug-NNN.md
/bug-triage ─────────────────────────────────────────────────► bugs re-prioritized + assigned
[Team skills for feature areas — spawn when working a full feature]
/team-combat / /team-narrative / /team-ui / /team-level / /team-audio
[QA cycle per sprint]
/qa-plan ────────────────────────────────────────────────────► production/qa/qa-plan-sprint-NN.md
/smoke-check ────────────────────────────────────────────────► smoke test gate (PASS/FAIL)
/regression-suite ───────────────────────────────────────────► coverage gaps + missing regression tests
/test-evidence-review ───────────────────────────────────────► evidence quality report
/test-flakiness ─────────────────────────────────────────────► flaky test report
/story-done [story] ─────────────────────────────────────────► story closed + next surfaced
/sprint-plan [next] ─────────────────────────────────────────► next sprint
▼ (after Production milestone)
/milestone-review ───────────────────────────────────────────► milestone report
/gate-check ─────────────────────────────────────────────────► PASS → advance to polish
PHASE 6: POLISH
/perf-profile ───────────────────────────────────────────────► perf report + fixes
/balance-check ──────────────────────────────────────────────► balance report + fixes
/asset-audit ────────────────────────────────────────────────► asset compliance report
/tech-debt ──────────────────────────────────────────────────► docs/tech-debt-register.md
/soak-test ──────────────────────────────────────────────────► soak test protocol + results
/localize ───────────────────────────────────────────────────► localization readiness report
/team-polish ────────────────────────────────────────────────► polish sprint orchestrated
/team-qa ────────────────────────────────────────────────────► full QA cycle sign-off
/gate-check ─────────────────────────────────────────────────► PASS → advance to release
PHASE 7: RELEASE
/launch-checklist ───────────────────────────────────────────► launch readiness report
/release-checklist ──────────────────────────────────────────► platform-specific checklist
/changelog ──────────────────────────────────────────────────► CHANGELOG.md
/patch-notes ────────────────────────────────────────────────► player-facing notes
/team-release ───────────────────────────────────────────────► release pipeline orchestrated
▼ (post-launch, ongoing)
/hotfix ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────► emergency fix with audit trail
/team-live-ops ──────────────────────────────────────────────► live-ops content plan
```
---
## Skill Chain: /design-system in Detail
How a single GDD gets authored, reviewed, and handed to architecture:
```
systems-index.md (input)
game-concept.md (input)
upstream GDDs (input, if any)
/design-system [name]
├── Pre-check: feasibility table + engine risk flags
├── Section cycle × 8:
│ question → options → decision → draft → approval → WRITE
│ [each section written to file immediately after approval]
└── Output: design/gdd/[system].md (complete, all 8 sections)
/design-review design/gdd/[system].md
├── APPROVED → mark DONE in systems-index, proceed to next system
├── NEEDS REVISION → agent shows specific issues, re-enter section cycle
└── MAJOR REVISION → significant redesign needed before next system
▼ (after all MVP GDDs + cross-review)
/review-all-gdds
└── Output: gdd-cross-review-[date].md
```
---
## Skill Chain: UX / UI Pipeline in Detail
UX specs are authored in Phase 4 (Pre-Production), before epics are written, so
that story acceptance criteria can reference specific UX artifacts.
```
design/gdd/*.md (UI/UX requirements extracted)
design/player-journey.md (emotional arc, if authored)
/ux-design hud → design/ux/hud.md
/ux-design screen [name] → design/ux/screens/[name].md
/ux-design patterns → design/ux/interaction-patterns.md
/ux-review design/ux/
├── APPROVED → UX specs ready, proceed to /create-epics
├── NEEDS REVISION → blocking issues listed → fix → re-run review
└── MAJOR REVISION → fundamental UX problems → redesign before epics
▼ (after APPROVED — in Phase 5 when implementing UI features)
/team-ui
├── Phase 1: /ux-design (if any specs still missing) + /ux-review
├── Phase 2: visual design (art-director)
├── Phase 3: layout implementation (ui-programmer)
├── Phase 4: accessibility audit (accessibility-specialist)
└── Phase 5: final review
Note: /ux-design and /ux-review belong in Phase 4 (Pre-Production).
/team-ui belongs in Phase 5 (Production) when a UI feature is being built.
```
---
## Skill Chain: Dev Story Flow in Detail
How a story moves from backlog to closed:
```
/story-readiness [story]
├── READY → Status: ready-for-dev → pick up for implementation
├── NEEDS WORK → agent shows specific gaps → resolve → re-run readiness
└── BLOCKED → ADR still Proposed, or upstream story incomplete
▼ (after READY)
/dev-story [story]
├── Reads: story file, linked GDD requirement, ADR decisions, control manifest
├── Routes to: gameplay-programmer / engine-programmer / ui-programmer / etc.
└── Implementation begins
▼ (optional, during/after implementation)
/code-review → architectural review of changeset
/scope-check → verify no scope creep vs. original story criteria
/test-evidence-review → validate test files and manual evidence quality
/story-done [story]
├── COMPLETE → Status: Complete, sprint-status.yaml updated, next story surfaced
├── COMPLETE WITH NOTES → complete but some criteria deferred (logged)
└── BLOCKED → acceptance criteria cannot be verified → investigate blocker
```
---
## Skill Chain: Story Lifecycle (Backlog to Closed)
How a story gets from backlog to closed (summary view):
```
/create-epics [layer]
└── Output: production/epics/[slug]/EPIC.md
/create-stories [epic-slug]
└── Output: production/epics/[slug]/story-NNN-[slug].md
(Status: Ready or Blocked if ADR is Proposed)
/story-readiness [story]
├── READY → /dev-story → implement → /story-done
├── NEEDS WORK → resolve gaps → re-run
└── BLOCKED → fix upstream dependency first
```
---
## Skill Chain: QA Pipeline in Detail
```
[Phase 4 — one-time infrastructure setup]
/test-setup ────────────────────────────────────────────────────► test framework scaffolded + CI/CD wired
/test-helpers ──────────────────────────────────────────────────► tests/helpers/[engine].gd (GDUnit4, NUnit, etc.)
[Phase 5 — per-sprint QA cycle]
/qa-plan [sprint or feature]
├── Reads: story files, GDDs, acceptance criteria
├── Classifies each story by test type:
│ Logic → automated unit test (BLOCKING)
│ Integration → integration test or documented playtest (BLOCKING)
│ Visual/Feel → screenshot + lead sign-off (ADVISORY)
│ UI → manual walkthrough or interaction test (ADVISORY)
│ Config/Data → smoke check (ADVISORY)
└── Output: production/qa/qa-plan-sprint-NN.md
/smoke-check
├── PASS → QA hand-off cleared
└── FAIL → block sprint close → fix critical paths first
/regression-suite
└── Coverage gaps + list of fixed bugs without regression tests
/test-evidence-review
└── Validates evidence quality, not just existence
▼ (if CI run history available)
/test-flakiness
└── Flaky test report + fix recommendations
[Phase 6 — extended stability testing]
/soak-test ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────► soak test protocol + observed results
/team-qa ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────► full QA cycle sign-off for release gate
[Ongoing — bug management]
/bug-report ────────────────────────────────────────────────────► production/qa/bugs/bug-NNN.md
/bug-triage ────────────────────────────────────────────────────► open bugs re-prioritized + assigned
[Meta — harness validation]
/skill-test [lint|spec|catalog] ────────────────────────────────► skill file structural + behavioral check
```
---
## Brownfield Onboarding Flow
For projects with existing work (use `/start` option D or run directly):
```
/project-stage-detect → stage detection report
/adopt
├── Phase 1: detect what exists
├── Phase 2: FORMAT audit (not just existence)
├── Phase 3: classify gaps (BLOCKING / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW)
├── Phase 4: ordered migration plan
├── Phase 5: write docs/adoption-plan-[date].md
└── Phase 6: fix most urgent gap inline (optional)
/design-system retrofit [path] → fills missing GDD sections
/architecture-decision retrofit [path] → fills missing ADR sections
/gate-check → where are you in the pipeline?
```
---
## How to Read These Diagrams
| Symbol | Meaning |
|--------|---------|
| `──►` | Produces this artifact |
| `│ ▼` | Flows into next step |
| `├──` | Branch (multiple possible outcomes) |
| `×N` | Runs N times (once per system, story, etc.) |
| `(input)` | Read by the skill but not produced here |
| `[optional]` | Not required for the gate to pass |
| `WRITE` (caps) | File written to disk immediately |
---
## Common Entry Points
| Where you are | Run this |
|---------------|---------|
| Brand new, no idea | `/start``/brainstorm` |
| Have a concept, no engine | `/setup-engine` |
| Have concept + engine | `/map-systems` |
| Mid-systems design | `/design-system [next system]` or `/map-systems next` |
| All GDDs done | `/review-all-gdds``/gate-check` |
| In technical setup | `/create-architecture``/architecture-decision` |
| Starting UX design | `/ux-design screen [name]` or `/ux-design hud` |
| Scaffolding tests | `/test-setup``/test-helpers` |
| Have stories, ready to code | `/story-readiness [story]``/dev-story [story]` |
| Story done | `/story-done [story]` |
| Running QA for a sprint | `/qa-plan``/smoke-check``/regression-suite` |
| Bug backlog needs sorting | `/bug-triage` |
| Extended stability testing | `/soak-test` |
| Not sure | `/help` |
| Existing project | `/adopt` |