pan/pixelheros
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

添加 claude code game studios 到项目

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
panw
2026-05-15 14:52:29 +08:00
parent dff559462d
commit a16fe4bff7
415 changed files with 78609 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

295
.claude/skills/quick-design/SKILL.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,295 @@
---
name: quick-design
description: "Lightweight design spec for small changes — tuning adjustments, minor mechanics, balance tweaks. Skips full GDD authoring when a system GDD already exists or the change is too small to warrant one. Produces a Quick Design Spec that embeds directly into story files."
argument-hint: "[brief description of the change]"
user-invocable: true
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Write, Edit, AskUserQuestion
model: sonnet
---
# Quick Design
This is the **lightweight design path** for changes that don't need a full GDD.
Full GDD authoring via `/design-system` is the heavyweight path. Use this skill
for work under approximately 4 hours of implementation — tuning adjustments,
minor behavioral tweaks, small additions to existing systems, or standalone
features too small to warrant a full document.
**Output:** `design/quick-specs/[name]-[date].md`
**When to run:** Anytime a change is too small for `/design-system` but too
meaningful to implement without a written rationale.
---
## 1. Classify the Change
First, read the argument and determine which category this change falls into:
- **Tuning** — changing numbers or balance values in an existing system with no
behavioral change (most minimal path). Example: "increase jump height from 5
to 6 units", "reduce enemy patrol speed by 10%".
- **Tweak** — a small behavioral change to an existing system that introduces no
new states, branches, or systems. Example: "make dash invincible on frame 1",
"allow combo to cancel into roll".
- **Addition** — adding a small mechanic to an existing system that may introduce
1-2 new states or interactions. Example: "add a parry window to the block
mechanic", "add a charge variant to the basic attack".
- **New Small System** — a standalone feature small enough that it has no
existing GDD and is under approximately one week of implementation work.
Example: "achievement popup system", "simple day/night visual cycle".
If the change does NOT fit these categories — it introduces a new system with
significant cross-system dependencies, requires more than one week of
implementation, or fundamentally alters an existing system's core rules — stop
and redirect to `/design-system` instead.
If there is no argument, ask the user to describe the change (plain text prompt), then classify it using the criteria above.
Present the inferred classification using `AskUserQuestion`:
- Prompt: "I've classified this as **[inferred type]** — [brief reason]. Is that correct?"
- Options:
- `[A] Yes — [inferred type] is correct`
- `[B] Tuning — changing numbers or balance values only`
- `[C] Tweak — small behavioral change to an existing system`
- `[D] Addition — adding a small mechanic to an existing system`
- `[E] New Small System — standalone feature, under one week of work`
- `[F] This is too large — redirect me to /design-system`
If [F]: stop. Verdict: **REDIRECTED** — use `/design-system` for this change.
Otherwise: proceed with the selected type.
---
## 2. Context Scan
Before drafting anything, read the relevant context:
- Search `design/gdd/` for the GDD most relevant to this change. Read the
sections that this change would affect.
- Check whether `design/gdd/systems-index.md` exists. If it does, read it to
understand where this system sits in the dependency graph and what tier it
belongs to. If it does not exist, note "No systems index found — skipping
dependency tier check." and continue.
- Check `design/quick-specs/` for any prior quick specs that touched this
system — avoid contradicting them.
- If this is a Tuning change, also check `assets/data/` for the data file that
holds the relevant values.
Report what was found: "Found GDD at [path]. Relevant section: [section name].
No conflicting quick specs found." (or note any conflicts found.)
---
## 3. Draft the Quick Design Spec
Use the appropriate spec format for the change category.
### For Tuning changes
Produce a single table:
```markdown
# Quick Design Spec: [Title]
**Type**: Tuning
**System**: [System name]
**GDD Reference**: `design/gdd/[filename].md` — Tuning Knobs section
**Date**: [today]
## Change
| Parameter | Old Value | New Value | Rationale |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|
| [param] | [old] | [new] | [why] |
## Tuning Knob Mapping
Maps to GDD Tuning Knob: [knob name and its documented range].
New value is [within / at the edge of / outside] the documented range.
[If outside: explain why the range should be extended.]
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] [Parameter] reads [new value] from `assets/data/[file]`
- [ ] Behavior difference is observable in [specific context]
- [ ] No regression in [related behavior]
```
### For Tweak and Addition changes
```markdown
# Quick Design Spec: [Title]
**Type**: [Tweak / Addition]
**System**: [System name]
**GDD Reference**: `design/gdd/[filename].md`
**Date**: [today]
## Change Summary
[1-2 sentences describing what changes and why.]
## Motivation
[Why is this change needed? What player experience problem does it solve?
Reference the relevant MDA aesthetic or player feedback if applicable.]
## Design Delta
Current GDD says (quoting `design/gdd/[filename].md`, [section]):
> [exact quote of the relevant rule or description]
This spec changes that to:
[New rule or description, written with the same precision as a GDD Detailed
Rules section. A programmer should be able to implement from this text alone.]
## New Rules / Values
[Full unambiguous statement of the replacement content. If this introduces
new states, list them. If it introduces new parameters, define their ranges.]
## Affected Systems
| System | Impact | Action Required |
|--------|--------|-----------------|
| [system] | [how it is affected] | [update GDD / update data file / no action] |
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] [Specific, testable criterion 1]
- [ ] [Specific, testable criterion 2]
- [ ] [Specific, testable criterion 3]
- [ ] No regression: [the original behavior this must not break]
## GDD Update Required?
[Yes / No]
[If yes: which file, which section, and what the update should say.]
```
### For New Small System changes
Use a trimmed GDD structure. Include only the sections that are directly
necessary — skip Player Fantasy, full Formulas, and Edge Cases unless the
system specifically requires them.
```markdown
# Quick Design Spec: [Title]
**Type**: New Small System
**Scope**: [1-2 sentence description of what this system does and doesn't do]
**Date**: [today]
**Estimated Implementation**: [hours]
## Overview
[One paragraph a new team member could understand. What does this system do,
when does it activate, and what does it produce?]
## Core Rules
[Unambiguous rules for the system. Use numbered lists for sequential behavior
and bullet lists for conditions. Be precise enough that a programmer can
implement without asking questions.]
## Tuning Knobs
| Knob | Default | Range | Category | Rationale |
|------|---------|-------|----------|-----------|
| [name] | [value] | [min–max] | [feel/curve/gate] | [why this default] |
All values must live in `assets/data/[appropriate-file].json`, not hardcoded.
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] [Functional criterion: does the right thing]
- [ ] [Functional criterion: handles the edge case]
- [ ] [Experiential criterion: feels right — what a playtest validates]
- [ ] [Regression criterion: does not break adjacent system]
## Systems Index
This system is not currently in `design/gdd/systems-index.md`.
[If it should be added: suggest which layer and priority tier.]
[If it is too small to track: state "This system is below systems-index
tracking threshold — quick spec is sufficient."]
```
---
## 4. Approval and Filing
Present the draft to the user in full. Then use `AskUserQuestion`:
- Prompt: "Here's the Quick Design Spec draft. How do you want to proceed?"
- Options:
- `[A] Approve — write it as shown`
- `[B] Revise — I'll describe what to change`
- `[C] This grew too large — redirect to /design-system instead`
If [B]: collect the requested changes, revise the draft, and re-present this widget.
If [C]: stop. Verdict: **REDIRECTED** — use `/design-system` for this change.
If [A]: ask "May I write this Quick Design Spec to
`design/quick-specs/[kebab-case-title]-[YYYY-MM-DD].md`?"
Use today's date in the filename. The title should be a kebab-case description
of the change (e.g., `jump-height-tuning-2026-03-10`,
`parry-window-addition-2026-03-10`).
If yes, create the `design/quick-specs/` directory if it does not exist, then
write the file.
If a GDD update is required (flagged in the spec), ask separately after
writing the quick spec:
"This spec modifies rules in [System Name]. May I update
`design/gdd/[filename].md` — specifically the [section name] section?"
Show the exact text that would be changed (old vs. new) before asking. Do not
make GDD edits without explicit approval.
---
## 5. Handoff
After writing the file, output:
```
Quick Design Spec written to: design/quick-specs/[filename].md
Type: [Tuning / Tweak / Addition / New Small System]
System: [system name]
GDD update: [Required — pending approval / Applied / Not required]
Next step: This spec is ready for `/story-readiness` validation before
implementation. Reference this spec in the story's GDD Reference field.
```
### Pipeline Notes
Verdict: **COMPLETE** — quick design spec written and ready for implementation.
Quick Design Specs **bypass** `/design-review` and `/review-all-gdds` by
design. They are for small, low-risk, well-scoped changes where the cost of
the full review pipeline exceeds the risk of the change itself.
Redirect to the full pipeline if any of the following are true:
- The change adds a new system that belongs in the systems index
- The change significantly alters cross-system behavior or a system's
contracts with other systems
- The change introduces new player-facing mechanics that affect the
game's MDA aesthetic balance
- Implementation is likely to exceed one week of work
In those cases: "This change has grown beyond quick-spec scope. I recommend
using `/design-system` to author a full GDD for this."
---
## Recommended Next Steps
- Run `/story-readiness [story-path]` to validate the story before implementation begins — reference this spec in the story's GDD Reference field
- Run `/dev-story [story-path]` to implement once the story passes readiness checks
- If the change is larger than expected, run `/design-system [system-name]` to author a full GDD instead