添加 claude code game studios 到项目

This commit is contained in:
panw
2026-05-15 14:52:29 +08:00
parent dff559462d
commit a16fe4bff7
415 changed files with 78609 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
# Vertical Slice Report: [Concept Name]
> **Date**: [YYYY-MM-DD]
> **Slice Duration**: [N days]
> **Target Scope**: 35 minutes of polished, continuous gameplay
> **Source GDD**: design/gdd/game-concept.md
---
## Validation Question
[The full game loop question this build was proving — both experience AND feasibility:
"Does a player, starting from nothing, experience [core fantasy] within [N] minutes,
without developer guidance — and can we build one such loop in [X] days at
representative quality?"]
---
## Scope Built
[Systems implemented, art quality level, what was intentionally omitted.]
**Systems included:**
- [System 1]
- [System 2]
- [...]
**Art/audio quality level:** [Placeholder / Representative / Near-shipping]
**Shortcuts taken deliberately:** [List]
**What was cut from original scope:** [List]
---
## Build Velocity Log
[Day-by-day record of what was completed. This is your real production rate data —
use it in sprint planning.]
| Day | Completed |
|-----|-----------|
| Day 1 | [What was built] |
| Day 2 | [What was built] |
| Day 3 | [What was built] |
| ... | ... |
**Total elapsed:** [N days] for [scope summary]
**Velocity estimate:** [N hours per equivalent scope unit — e.g., "1 day per combat
encounter, 0.5 days per UI screen"]
---
## Playtest Results
| Attribute | Value |
|-----------|-------|
| Total sessions | [N] |
| Internal testers | [N] |
| External testers | [N — people who had not seen the game, if available] |
| Avg session length | [N minutes (target: [N] minutes)] |
| Time to first meaningful action | [N seconds (target: [N] seconds)] |
---
## Observations
[Specific, non-opinion observations from playtest sessions. Quote testers where useful.]
**Where testers succeeded without guidance:**
- [...]
**Where testers were confused or stuck:**
- [...]
**Emotional reactions observed:**
- [...]
---
## Metrics
| Metric | Target | Actual |
|--------|--------|--------|
| Time to first meaningful action | [N sec] | [N sec] |
| Session length | [N min] | [N min] |
| Critical fun blockers found | 0 | [N] |
| Pipeline blockers found | 0 | [N] |
| Architecture surprises | 0 | [N] |
**Feel assessment:** [Specific — "combat feedback weak; no impact sound on hit" not "felt rough"]
---
## Recommendation: [PROCEED / PIVOT / KILL]
[One paragraph with evidence — reference the validation question directly. Did a
player experience the core fantasy within the target time, without developer guidance?
Can the team build at this quality on the projected schedule?]
---
## If Proceeding
**Production requirements** (what must change from slice to production):
- [e.g., "Replace placeholder art with shipped assets"]
- [e.g., "Combat system needs 2 more weapon types"]
**Architecture adjustments needed:**
- [ADR to update or create]
**Sprint velocity estimate based on slice data:**
- [e.g., "1 day per enemy type, 2 days per level section, 0.5 days per UI screen"]
**Scope adjustments from original design:**
- [What the slice revealed about the true production scope]
**Performance targets:** [Confirmed / Revised — list changes if revised]
**Playtest note:** Run `/playtest-report` to structure additional session data
before running `/gate-check pre-production`.
**Next steps:**
1. `/gate-check pre-production` — formally advance to Production
2. `/create-epics layer:foundation` — plan Foundation layer epics
3. `/create-epics layer:core` — plan Core layer epics
4. `/sprint-plan` — use velocity data from this report in the estimate
---
## If Pivoting
[Which GDDs need revision and why — be specific about the failure mode observed.]
**Systems requiring GDD revision:** [List]
**Architecture decisions to revisit:** [List — use `/architecture-decision` to update]
**Core loop change needed:** [What specifically to change]
**Next steps:**
1. `/design-system [mechanic]` — revise affected GDDs
2. `/architecture-decision [decision]` — address architecture issues
3. `/vertical-slice` — re-validate after revisions
---
## If Killing
[Why the full game loop does not work at this quality level. What specifically
prevented the player from experiencing the core fantasy. What to do instead.]
**Next step:** `/brainstorm` to explore a new direction, or `/prototype [new-concept]`
to test a different concept cheaply before investing in another vertical slice.
---
## Lessons Learned
- **What assumptions were broken by building to near-production quality?**
[...]
- **What surprised us about the pipeline or architecture?**
[...]
- **What would we change about the slice scope if we ran this again?**
[...]
---
> *Vertical slice code location: `prototypes/[concept-name]-vertical-slice/`*
> *This code is reference material only. Production implementation is written from scratch.*
> *Never import or refactor this code into production.*